100+ free calculators - no signup, no ads | ๐Ÿ’ฐ Financial โค๏ธ Health & Fitness ๐Ÿ“ Math ๐Ÿ”ง Other
Units:

Target Heart Rate Calculator

Karvonen formula ยท 5 training zones ยท 3 MHR formulas ยท RPE scale ยท Step-by-step

MHR Estimation Formula
Haskell-Fox: MHR = 220 - age (most common)

โค๏ธ Enter your age (and optionally resting heart rate) to calculate your five personalised training heart rate zones.

Heart Rate Formulas

Maximum Heart Rate Estimation

Maximum heart rate (MHR) is the highest number of beats per minute the heart can achieve during maximal exercise. It is most accurately determined through a graded cardiac stress test, but is commonly estimated using age-based formulas because laboratory testing is impractical for most people.

Haskell-Fox (1971): MHR = 220 - age Most widely used. Convenient but has a standard deviation of ยฑ10-12 bpm. Tanaka, Monahan, Seals (2001): MHR = 208 - (0.7 ร— age) Based on a meta-analysis of 351 studies. More accurate for older adults. Nes et al. (2013): MHR = 211 - (0.64 ร— age) Derived from 3,320 healthy adults. Tends to give higher estimates for older ages. Example (age 35): Haskell-Fox: 220-35 = 185 ยท Tanaka: 208-24.5 = 183.5 ยท Nes: 211-22.4 = 188.6

Karvonen Formula

The Karvonen formula incorporates resting heart rate to personalise zone calculations:

THR = (MHR - RHR) ร— intensity% + RHR MHR = maximum heart rate ยท RHR = resting heart rate HRR = MHR - RHR (heart rate reserve) Example: Age 35, MHR 185, RHR 65 HRR = 185 - 65 = 120 Zone 3 (70-80%): 120ร—0.70+65=149 to 120ร—0.80+65=161 bpm

The Five Training Zones

Zone 1
50 to 60%
Recovery
Active recovery, warm-up, cool-down. Very low effort, fully aerobic.
Zone 2
60 to 70%
Aerobic Base
Fat burning, endurance foundation, conversational pace. Sustainable for hours.
Zone 3
70 to 80%
Aerobic
Tempo pace. Improves aerobic capacity and lactate clearance. Somewhat hard.
Zone 4
80 to 90%
Threshold
Lactate threshold. Hard, sustainable 20-40 min. Raises anaerobic threshold.
Zone 5
90 to 100%
VO2max
Maximum effort. Short bursts only. Develops VO2max and speed. Needs full recovery.
โ„น๏ธ
Most endurance coaches recommend spending 70 to 80% of weekly training volume in Zones 1 and 2, with the remaining 20 to 30% in Zones 3 through 5. Spending too much time in Zone 3 (sometimes called the "grey zone") accumulates fatigue without producing the adaptations of either low-intensity Zone 2 work or high-intensity Zone 4 to 5 work.

Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scales

RPE scales allow estimation of exercise intensity without measuring heart rate directly. They are useful when monitoring devices are not available and have been validated in research as reasonable proxies for physiological intensity measures.

Borg Scale (6 to 20)

RPEPerceived Exertion~Heart Rate
6No exertion at all~60 bpm
7 to 8Extremely light~70-80
9 to 10Very light~90-100
11 to 12Light~110-120
13 to 14Somewhat hard~130-140
15 to 16Hard (heavy)~150-160
17 to 18Very hard~170-180
19Extremely hard~190
20Maximal exertionMax

The scale is designed so each number ร— 10 approximates heart rate in a healthy adult. It was developed by Swedish psychologist Gunnar Borg in 1970.

Modified Borg CR10 Scale

RPEPerceived ExertionZone Approx.
0Nothing at allRest
0.5Very, very weakZone 1
1Very weakZone 1
2Weak (light)Zone 1-2
3ModerateZone 2
4Somewhat strongZone 2-3
5 to 6Strong (heavy)Zone 3-4
7 to 8Very strongZone 4
9Very, very strongZone 4-5
10MaximalZone 5

The CR10 (category ratio) scale uses a 0 to 10 range and is better suited for measuring sensations like pain, breathlessness, and localised muscle fatigue rather than overall exertion.

Target Heart Rate by Age Reference

AgeMHR (Haskell)Zone 2 (60-70%)Zone 3 (70-80%)Zone 4 (80-90%)
20200120-140140-160160-180
25195117-137137-156156-176
30190114-133133-152152-171
35185111-130130-148148-167
40180108-126126-144144-162
45175105-123123-140140-158
50170102-119119-136136-153
5516599-116116-132132-149
6016096-112112-128128-144
6515593-109109-124124-140
7015090-105105-120120-135

These ranges use simple % of MHR (no resting heart rate). Add your RHR using the Karvonen formula for more personalised targets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does resting heart rate matter for zone calculations?
Resting heart rate reflects cardiovascular fitness. A trained endurance athlete might have a resting heart rate of 45 bpm while a sedentary adult has 75 bpm. Both might have the same maximum heart rate. Without accounting for resting heart rate, their Zone 2 target would be identical. With the Karvonen formula, the athlete's Zone 2 will be a higher absolute bpm because their heart rate reserve (MHR minus RHR) is larger, reflecting their greater cardiovascular capacity.
How accurate is the 220 minus age formula?
The Haskell-Fox formula (220 minus age) has a standard deviation of approximately ยฑ10 to 12 bpm. This means 68% of people fall within ยฑ12 bpm of the estimate. For a 35-year-old, the formula gives 185 bpm, but the actual maximum for two-thirds of 35-year-olds falls between 173 and 197 bpm. The formula is a useful population average but should not be treated as a precise individual measurement. The Tanaka and Nes formulas have somewhat better accuracy, especially for older adults.
What is heart rate reserve and why is it important?
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is the difference between maximum and resting heart rate: HRR = MHR - RHR. It represents the usable range of the heart's capacity above its baseline. A larger HRR generally indicates better cardiovascular fitness. The Karvonen formula uses HRR as the basis for zone calculations, producing zones that are proportional to the functional capacity of the individual's cardiovascular system rather than just their maximum heart rate.
What is the Maffetone Method?
The Maffetone Method, developed by Dr. Phil Maffetone, defines the maximum aerobic heart rate as 180 minus age (with adjustments for health status and training history). Training at or below this ceiling is claimed to build aerobic base without crossing into anaerobic work, promoting fat burning, reducing injury risk, and building sustainable long-term fitness. It is more conservative than most standard Zone 2 targets and is widely used by endurance athletes, triathletes, and ultra-marathon runners.